The saga of Uri Berliner, a senior editor at NPR, has some interesting angles from an employment law perspective.
Berliner published an article in The Free Press that
detailed a lack of political and intellectual diversity at NPR that he claimed
significantly damaged its journalism. He criticized the monoculture and
groupthink mentality that supposedly permeates NPR's decision-making with
respect to the stories that it covers and how it covers them. NPR's new CEO
came in for specific criticism in the article, which was published without
prior coordination from NPR management, and which violates NPR's internal
policies.
The organization's reaction was immediate- it suspended
Berliner for five days without pay and warned him that if he spoke or
provided content to another outside media entity without prior NPR approval he
would be fired.
My first reaction upon reading this was that NPR's actions were almost certainly a violation of Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, which prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who engage in so-called “protected concerted activity.” “Protected concerted activity” has two elements- the activity, typically a complaint or other demonstration of dissatisfaction, must relate to the terms and conditions of employment, and it must relate to circumstances that affect other members of the organization, not just the individual raising the concern. The term has recently been litigated before the National Labor Relations Board which adopted a “totality of the circumstances” analysis to determine whether employee conduct falls under the coverage of Section 7.
It's clear that Berliner’s comments fall within the ambit of
this term. The issue is whether NPR fired him for this conduct or for the
alleged violation of its internal policies. And here I think NPR has some
problems. For one thing, there are apparently other instances where NPR members
either granted interviews or wrote for other outside media without facing
disciplinary action. Perhaps more importantly, the immediate response by NPR
management against a long-time senior employee with little or no investigation
and only a whiff of progressive discipline is indicative of a response based on
the content of the column and not its lack of coordination.
Berliner has indicated he will not challenge the suspension
but this widely publicized story is a cautionary tale for management. In
situations like this, avoid the immediate, knee-jerk response to hit back at
the employee. NPR would have been better served by taking its time, performing
an investigation (and especially an investigation that looked at other examples
of this conduct and the discipline meted out), and then dealing with the
employee. The company may have dodged a bullet here.
No comments:
Post a Comment